--abHgUoWNUdkkRBEn
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, Jul 31, 2005 at 12:52:25PM +0900, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
> > Yes.  If an options will be used in the vast majority of cases, it
> > shouldn't have to specified.
>=20
> why not?
> do you want to turn INET to NO_INET?

Actually, yes, I'd rather see INET turned on by default, and having
a commented out line in GENERIC that goes like that:

#no options INET

But then, you're citing a bad example.  That mistake has been made
years ago, and maybe at that time it probably wasn't clear that INET
would become so spread.

--=20
Quentin Garnier - cube@cubidou.net - cube@NetBSD.org
"When I find the controls, I'll go where I like, I'll know where I want
to be, but maybe for now I'll stay right here on a silent sea."
KT Tunstall, Silent Sea, Eye to the Telescope, 2004.

--abHgUoWNUdkkRBEn
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (NetBSD)

iQEVAwUBQuyzaNgoQloHrPnoAQKRfQgApOdS3eRaE/xSO8vhAyNhcZoj2LK4xo2g
hSw75Uvi1buKQIu0a8R0IEmjNPW1ElEnd4g+cNa/swRVee9Y6MxAAQ/D95BvuiSY
B6kLtxSe/mnbXWzp43c+cC4BWEuuM/wllzeyqP4qcf5Y9m2Ph7nAGoVjuV4oiEbf
Vdy03sp8tG/KOF6NoAleMU6eVgy7cfBLnlUvg/71671r9KV7x6CVYgJ7TVx10gRd
hTHPi1tVrAyVyPGzvXRhyyAZ4gJlcCTeh3y4mBP6DJ7NGma2DrHKU6F1Kgz92AgM
mDeISlDuADC+gWsnXAHGn4POdt1s8w3H8OMn8Rb9qzVM9Yvn8XW+ag==
=uU3O
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--abHgUoWNUdkkRBEn--