On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 12:54:16PM +0900, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
> > > see sbspace().
> > > 
> > > > What would
> > > > be the consequence of this ?
> > > 
> > > suboptimal flowcontrol.
> > 
> > Shouldn't this be fixed ? Setups with 4k clusters can be desireable on systems
> > using non-ethernet network adapters, or even with gigabit adapters.
> 
> how?
> copying more eagerly in sbcompress?
> making cluster size variable?

Well, I don't know. I don't know anything about the socket code.
But making cluster size variable doesn't look a good idea at first glance,
as it would defeat what I'm trying to do in Xen :)

> anyway it doesn't belong source-changes. :)

Sure. But as I don't know anything about this part of the kernel I'll stop
here :)

-- 
Manuel Bouyer <bouyer@antioche.eu.org>
     NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
--