On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 03:30:40PM +0000, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 12:17:10PM +0000, Rui Paulo wrote:
> > This broke i386 because it does not define LINUX_NPTL but has
> > linux_sched_{get|set}affinity().
> 
> Oh, yes, that's because Tom just added them to i386 syscall.master
> in order to restore the build when linux_sched_{get|set}affinity()
> were not ifdef LINUX_NPTL. I did not noticed it. A build break for a
> build break :-)
> 
> The simpliest way is probably to back out that change. Tom, is it
> okay for you?

Err, if linux_sched_{get|set}affinity() doesn't require other
LINUX_NPTL code, it should rather be added to all ports, shouldn't
it?

Jaromir
-- 
Jaromir Dolecek <jdolecek@NetBSD.org>            http://www.NetBSD.cz/
-=- We can walk our road together if our goals are all the same;     -=-
-=- We can run alone and free if we pursue a different aim.          -=-