On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 10:31:52AM -0500, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
> > but this api was not in any netbsd release, hence, should be
> > considered -- like anything else in -current -- "unstable".
> I think if it wasn't in a release Elad is probably correct.

To a certain extent.  But we generally try to do the right
thing if the code is in HEAD.  If something is still really
experimental and isn't being used in anything, why is it in
the HEAD of our public source tree (and therefore in a release
branch as soon as we cut one)?

-allen

-- 
                  Use NetBSD!  http://www.NetBSD.org/