Source-Changes archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: CVS commit: src/sys
christos%astron.com@localhost (Christos Zoulas) writes:
> In article <20060415063916.9009B23402%thoreau.thistledown.com.au@localhost>,
> Simon Burge <simonb%wasabisystems.com@localhost> wrote:
>>Brett Lymn wrote:
>>
>>> Module Name: src
>>> Committed By: blymn
>>> Date: Fri Apr 14 13:09:07 UTC 2006
>>>
>>> ...
>>> src/sys/sys: iostat.h
>>
>>The new "struct io_stats" has members like:
>>
>> char *name; /* device name */
>> void *parent; /* pointer to what we are attached to */
>> int type; /* type of device the state belong to */
>> int busy; /* busy counter */
>>
>>Should these names have io_ prefixes? The current names are a bit
>>"generic", and could cause issues in code that includes <sys/iostat.h>.
>>
> They should. Let's do it.
Er, we live in an age of modern compilers -- the namespace inside
structs is struct specific. Why do struct members need prefixes like
io_?
Perry
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index