> > Also, why didn't you try adding support for that on i386, too?  I
> > haven't seen anything in the spec that restricts Cool'n'Quiet to long
> > mode.  And I still feel bitmask_snprintf would be more suitable than
> > your own equivalent.
> 
> Do we want to have another i386/i386/powernow_k8.c? my goal is
> to share most of the code between drivers.

We should have just one powernow_k8.c in x86/x86/.

-- 
TAMURA Kent <kent_2006 at hauN.org> <kent at NetBSD.org>