In article <060827160158.M0128818@mirage.ceres.dti.ne.jp>,
Izumi Tsutsui  <tsutsui@ceres.dti.ne.jp> wrote:
>christos@astron.com wrote:
>
>> This is really not needed. It is better to make the counter volatile.
>
>It generates differnent code from the previous.
>With volatile the counter is allocated on memory (not register)
>and it would cause longer DELAY(9).

I guess it is ok to leave it as you have it, but I generally don't like
using assembly when I don't have to.

christos