On Monday 2006-08-28 17:26 +0400, Valeriy E. Ushakov output:
:On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 13:37:41 +1000, Geoff Wing wrote:
:> Yeah, I only had a problem with netinet/in_proto.c when compiling a
:> kernel but I listed all with ones with empty trailing elements in
:> the struct assignments,
:> i.e.  { a, b, c, }, ...   vs  { a, b, c }, ...
:It's not an empty trailing element.  C99 allows the comma after the
:alst element in the list of initiliazers (and also in enums).

I guess most of my C is still back in the 80s with only small bits and pieces
from recent era :-)  Thank you for the explanation.  Possibly I've come
across it before and just forgotten.

In this case a struct element was removed so (in a very simple form):

	struct { int a, b, c; } foo[] = { { 1, 2, } };
went to
	struct { int a, b; }    foo[] = { { 1, 2, } };

with the structure changing but the initializer remaining the same.
I thought it somewhat in poor form.

In another message, Christos said that they'll be fixed later.  Since it
compiles properly now, I presume it's not high priority.

Regards,
Geoff