matthew green <mrg@eterna.com.au> writes:

> perhaps a particular "-fbar-foo" is responsible for causing this to
> happen?  i don't mind the kern_synch.c symbol going away, but the
> ras test one seems to be useful more generally.

I've built sun2 tools and determined that -fno-reorder-blocks will do
the trick (and also that -fno-unit-at-a-time won't).

I'm not clear on how gcc decides how large the code for an asm will be
(since it doesn't attempt to parse it SFAIK); if there were some way
to pass it in, that might be more generally useful.

-- 
(let ((C call-with-current-continuation)) (apply (lambda (x y) (x y)) (map
((lambda (r) ((C C) (lambda (s) (r (lambda l (apply (s s) l))))))  (lambda
(f) (lambda (l) (if (null? l) C (lambda (k) (display (car l)) ((f (cdr l))
(C k)))))))    '((#\J #\d #\D #\v #\s) (#\e #\space #\a #\i #\newline)))))