Chuck Silvers wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 12:00:56PM +0900, Izumi Tsutsui wrote:
>> elad@NetBSD.org wrote:
>>
>>> Applied slightly different patch (u_int64_t -> uint64_t), thanks!
>> Isn't u_quad_t better as defined in <sys/vnode.h> for va_size?
> 
> it would really be better to change va_size to uint64_t
> rather than the other way around.

If there are no objections, I'll revert the commit to dev/vnd.c so
it uses uint64_t and change va_size in sys/vnode.h to uint64_t.

-e.

-- 
Elad Efrat