On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 15:28:03 -0500, Christos Zoulas wrote:

> | explorer@flame.org said:
> | > (long) is probably more correct. 
> | 
> | OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER is still documented to be long, see
> | OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER(3).
> | So I'd prefer to correct the openssl header. This could save
> | us trouble with 3rd party applications too.
> 
> I can do that, but remember it is not long now in the openssl sources.

Well, it's not *really*.  I think that was messed in 0.9.8b -> 0.9.8c
transition.

http://cvs.openssl.org/filediff?f=openssl/crypto/opensslv.h&v1=1.44.2.20&v2=1.44.2.21

Note that the trunk (and 0.9.7 branch) still has the 'L' intact.

http://cvs.openssl.org/getfile/openssl/crypto/opensslv.h?v=1.45

SY, Uwe
-- 
uwe@ptc.spbu.ru                         |       Zu Grunde kommen
http://snark.ptc.spbu.ru/~uwe/          |       Ist zu Grunde gehen