In article <061128004245.M0118285@mirage.ceres.dti.ne.jp>,
Izumi Tsutsui  <tsutsui@ceres.dti.ne.jp> wrote:
>thorpej@shagadelic.org wrote:
>
>> > COPTS should have -O2 otherwise we'll get no generic optimization.
>> >
>> > XXX: I prefer CPUFLAGS, but there isn't any conclusion yet.
>> 
>> No conclusion about what?  CPUFLAGS is what should be used to specify  
>> e.g. 586-or-higher compiler flags, etc.  That is what was intended  
>> when I added the option.
>
>I know you said so and I agree with you, but I don't know
>who can conclude it (nor get any answer from tls).
>I've just added it to COPTS as temporary fix because
>having no optimization in GENERIC was too bad.

I don't see the problem. Your change hides the problem, and prevents us
from understanding what is going on, so I would back it out.

christos