--2hMgfIw2X+zgXrFs
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 08:16:21PM +0000, Pavel Cahyna wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 07:39:06PM +0100, Nick Hudson wrote:
> > On Tuesday 22 May 2007 10:33, Pavel Cahyna wrote:
> > >
> > > Could it be pulled up to netbsd-4 ?
> >=20
> > As Bill says the whole wrstuden-fixsa branch should be pulled up to net=
bsd-4.=20
>=20
> I have meant, if it can be done now, before the 4.0 release,
> independently of the rest of the changes in the fixsa branch.

Unfortunately you zapped the part of Nick's answer that really will=20
determine this:

> atm, gdb6 mostly works for i386 and some other arches. The remainder shou=
ld
> be fixed. All of them should be tested.

Are the broken arch's better off or worse off with this change? If
"better" (or at least not worse), then it's a question for releng. Though
given the limtied testing, I think we probably have missed the boat for
4.0.

Take care,

Bill

--2hMgfIw2X+zgXrFs
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFGVkazWz+3JHUci9cRAlUrAJ9lzFwGd6YxXW7MuGQRjhUl5KZAcwCfWa9K
RCbEX2kGsC2yF/cIIdnSwlk=
=Meir
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--2hMgfIw2X+zgXrFs--