On Thu, 21 Jun 2007, Antti Kantee wrote:
> As a purely personal remark, I'm glad we finally have newgrp(1), as I've
> missed it on a couple occasions.

I thought newgrp(1) was superseded by supplementary groups, apparently 
it's not.

Can you remind me where one uses newgrp(1) today - creating files with a 
special group?


  - Hubert