> On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 00:49:46 +0900 (JST)
> yamt@mwd.biglobe.ne.jp (YAMAMOTO Takashi) wrote:
> 
> > > But IMHO for this specific case the current code is much simpler and
> > > shorter than this one.
> > > 
> > > It is possible to extend sysmon_envsys(9) with more classes and
> > > abstraction if needed in the future.
> > 
> > sorry, what's your point?
> > are you suggesting to add specific code in on-demand basis for
> > each specific cases, rather than making it generic?
> 
> I'm suggesting to wait until other feature like this is necessary;
> if a more generic framework is needed, I'll work on it.

and you will need unnecessary compat code for this specific case, won't you?

YAMAMOTO Takashi

> And no, I won't add specific code in on-demand basis for specific cases.
> 
> A more generic solution is already there (powerres.diff)...
> 
> -- 
> Juan Romero Pardines	- The NetBSD Project
> http://plog.xtrarom.org	- NetBSD/pkgsrc news in Spanish