On Tue, 16 Oct 2007, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
> I have actually asked about importing this on at least four separate
> occasions and the few objections I received today were the first ones,
> ever.

I have no objection to adding bozohttpd, but I do object to adding it
without discussion.  I'd expect the discussion to answer questions like:
Why this particular http server, not something else?  Why not use a
reachover build from src/dist/bozohttpd?

If it was discussed so long ago that I have forgotten, then I withdraw
my objection.

> I do not believe (contrary to what Alan's mail seems to imply) that
> NetBSD developers are required to get prior clearance for all commits
> on one of the public mailing lists -- if there is a new policy in
> effect that says this, please let me know.

According to <http://www.netbsd.org/developers/commit-guidelines.html>:

    Implementing (significant) new features requires a prior
    discussion on an appropriate technical mailing list.

In my opinion, an http server is a significant new feature, so it would
fall under that guideline.

--apb (Alan Barrett)