On Mon, 3 Dec 2007, Tom Spindler wrote:

> > I'm not sure why but that compiles ok on my system. The intention seems to
> > be to fail if the packet length was not exactly right, nor the type found
> > in the list.
>
> Yeah; it's extremely weird that it only fails for me on ARM. and yeah,
> setting i=0 to will let it build

I committed that in the meantime then

> - but I can't decide if the latter bit of code is supposed to loop
> similarly to the prior hunk, or only check the first packet.

pkt[] is a list of valid packet types that is being checked rather than
the actual packet, so its checking for invalid packets..

regards,
iain