Re: openssl/des.h or kerberosIV/des.h, or both?

[itojun%iijlab.net@localhost]

>The last change to libkrb/Makefile has some consequences:
>-To make the tree build again, either openssl/des.h can't
> be installed into include/kerberosIV anymore, or it would need
> some additional Makefile magic.
> I suppose the former is more reasonable, because two identical
> copies don't make much sense, and krb.h refers to openssl/des.h
> anyway (as patched by some Makefile rule).

        i agree so.  i'll remove des.h from INCS.

>-If this is right, should des.h be included as <openssl/des.h>
> in libraries and applications, or should the -I paths in the
> Makefiles be adapted/added?

        <openssl/des.h> is the right way.  -I/usr/include/openssl + <des.h>
        is discouraged by openssl project.

itojun