Subject: Re: openssl 0.9.7 in NetBSD?
To: None <itojun@iijlab.net>
From: Love <lha@stacken.kth.se>
List: tech-crypto
Date: 06/29/2003 08:47:55
--=-=-=
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
itojun@iijlab.net writes:
>>> here are differences in terms of library symbols. it seems that the
>>> biggest difference is rename of des_xx functions to DES_xx functions.
>>> it has a large impact on existing codebase, i guess. we may need to
>>> provide aliases or whatever.
>> DES/des functions are not renames, but API changes. see des_old.h
>> shipped with 0.9.7b. we may need to supply old functions to users,
>> for backward compat's sake (or a shlib major bump).
>
> a split of libdes and libcrypto is clearly needed.
> which functions have to be provided by libdes?
but libdes and libcrypto will then provide the same symbols. There are
applications that link agaist both libcrypto and libdes.
Love
--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (NetBSD)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=HW2o
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--