>>[*] I had planned to wait for dynamic-sysctl before adding a sysctl
   >>tree for crypto; if dynamic sysctl is deferred I may revisit that.
   >
   >it's not very deferred...i'm just polishing it, doing testing,
   >building kernels, etc.
   >
   >can you wait a few more days?
   
   dynamic sysctl was committed about ten days ago, and i think most of
   the problems with it have been shaken out at this point, so besides
   the fact that i haven't finished all the documentation yet...


note that this really matters, but i noticed that new userland &
old kernel doesn't like sysctl very much :-)


.mrg.