Hi.

Yes, seems I found MINIROOTSIZE on the web googling and used it blindly.
The interesting thing is the kernel did not complain about it.


On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 13:31:41 +0200
Jukka Salmi <j+nbsd@2005.salmi.ch> wrote:

> Marcin Jessa --> tech-embed (2005-03-30 09:01:22 +0000):
> [...]
> > options         MEMORY_DISK_HOOKS
> > options         MEMORY_DISK_IS_ROOT     # force root on memory disk
> > options         MEMORY_DISK_SERVER=0    # no userspace memory disk support
> > options         MINIROOTSIZE=20480      # size of memory disk, in blocks
> 
> Shouldn't this be MEMORY_DISK_ROOT_SIZE=20480?
> 
> 
> HTH, Jukka
> 
> -- 
> bashian roulette:
> $ ((RANDOM%6)) || rm -rf ~


-- 

Regards,
M. Jessa
http://www.yazzy.org