tech-embed archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: Real Time O.S vs 'conventional' one.

To: Stefan 'Kaishakunin' Schumacher <stefan%net-tex.de@localhost>
Subject: Re: Real Time O.S vs 'conventional' one.
From: Rob Evans <internetplumber%gmail.com@localhost>
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 12:25:01 +0100

> So my advice is NetBSD, don't forget, it holds the Internet2 Land
> Speed Record[2] :-)

Just to be pedantic, "held,"  not "holds." The results posted with
NetBSD have since been broken.

    http://lsr.internet2.edu/

Cheers,
Rob

References:
- Real Time O.S vs 'conventional' one.
  - From: Marcin Jessa
- Re: Real Time O.S vs 'conventional' one.
  - From: Stefan 'Kaishakunin' Schumacher

Prev by Date: Re: Real Time O.S vs 'conventional' one.
Next by Date: Re: Real Time O.S vs 'conventional' one.
Previous by Thread: Re: Real Time O.S vs 'conventional' one.
Next by Thread: Re: Real Time O.S vs 'conventional' one.
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index