Re: Real Time O.S vs 'conventional' one.

[Timo Schoeler <timo.schoeler%riscworks.net@localhost>]

On Wed, 26 Oct 2005 14:18:45 +0200 (MEST)
"Zafer Aydogan" <zafer%gmx.org@localhost> wrote:

> > --- Ursprüngliche Nachricht ---
> > Von: "Stefan 'Kaishakunin' Schumacher" <stefan%net-tex.de@localhost>
> > An: Marcin Jessa <lists%yazzy.org@localhost>
> > Kopie: NetBSD-embed <tech-embed%NetBSD.org@localhost>, NetBSD-net
> > <tech-net%netbsd.org@localhost>
> > Betreff: Re: Real Time O.S vs 'conventional' one.
> > Datum: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 13:17:52 +0200
> > 
> > Also sprach Marcin Jessa (lists%yazzy.org@localhost)
> >  
> > > I have embedded boards which I want to use as acess points for WLAN
> > > infrastructure.
> > > The choice is between NetBSD and Real Time Linux.
> > > What I am wondering about is if there is any advantage using real
> > > time O.S on wireless enviroment. 
> 
> That depends. If you want to run a business, then you don't want to run
> NetBSD at all, at least not right now, because it is buggy and under heavy
> development.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

(besides the massive x-posting: am i missing <irony> </irony> tags? aren't there
several commercial products using NetBSD or based upon it?)

> If it is just for your home environment, you can give it a try.
> 
> 
> > So my advice is NetBSD, don't forget, it holds the Internet2 Land
> > Speed Record[2] :-)
> > 
> It had held the speed record once. Linux has broken it a couple times.

hm, i think then it's time to do it again? ;)

timo