Re: Real Time O.S vs 'conventional' one.

To: tech-embed%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: Real Time O.S vs 'conventional' one.
From: "Daniel R. Killoran,Ph.D." <drkilloran%speakeasy.net@localhost>
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 14:57:08 -0400

In the hopes of squelching the incipient flames, I feel obliged toremark that most cross-platform OSes work better on one platform thanthe others, and Linux and NetBSD are no exception. Pick your platformbefore deciding on an OS.


Dan Killoran

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Real Time O.S vs 'conventional' one.
  - From: Mike Cheponis

References:
- Re: Real Time O.S vs 'conventional' one.
  - From: Stefan 'Kaishakunin' Schumacher
- Re: Real Time O.S vs 'conventional' one.
  - From: Zafer Aydogan
- Re: Real Time O.S vs 'conventional' one.
  - From: Ian Zagorskih

Prev by Date: Re: Real Time O.S vs 'conventional' one.
Next by Date: help: routerboard 532 with NetBSD
Previous by Thread: Re: Real Time O.S vs 'conventional' one.
Next by Thread: Re: Real Time O.S vs 'conventional' one.
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index