Subject: Re: Unpriviledged installs (was Re: CVS commit: sharesrc)
To: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>
From: Simon Burge <simonb@netbsd.org>
List: tech-install
Date: 08/16/1999 11:58:48
Michael Richardson wrote:
> >>>>> "Simon" == Simon Burge <simonb@netbsd.org> writes:
> Simon> In bsd.doc.mk and bsd.files.mk "${INSTALL} ${RENAME} ${PRESERVE}" has
> Simon> changed to "${INSTALL} ${PRESERVE}". Is there a reason for this? The
> Simon> other files seem ok.
>
> This is a mistake. What is the intended purpose of ${RENAME}, btw.
>
> Simon> That said, wouldn't it be easier to use the -U option of install? I'm
> Simon> pretty sure that -U came well after PR #3563. From the install(1)
> Simon> manpage:
>
> This is new. Yes, it would be better. As such, I withdraw my patches.
>
> Simon> -U Indicate that install is running unpriviledged, and that it
> Simon> should not try to change the owner or the group of the destina-
> Simon> tion. A future version of this file may log the owner/group in-
> Simon> formation elsewhere; currently, it's just discarded.
>
> Simon> Then we could just stick
>
> Simon> UNPRIVILEDGED?=
>
> Simon> in bsd.own.mk and use that on all the install commands...
>
> Yes, please!
> Do you want me to do these patches?
I think there's a slightly better way of doing this. In bsd.README:
UNPRIVILEDGED If defined, don't set the owner/group/mode when installing
files or directories (incomplete).
and then in <bsd.own.mk>
.if defined(UNPRIVILEDGED)
INSTPRIV?= -U
.endif
and use ${INSTPRIV} in the ${INSTALL} lines. This was UNPRIVILEDGED can
be used to tweak a class of things (mtree comes to mind - I'll look at
that next).
Sound good?
Simon.