Subject: Re: building docs on "make release"
To: Todd Whitesel <toddpw@best.com>
From: Hubert Feyrer <feyrer@rfhs8012.fh-regensburg.de>
List: tech-install
Date: 03/02/2000 00:25:30
On Tue, 29 Feb 2000, Todd Whitesel wrote:
> I'm doing 1.4.2 by having each etc/etc.*/Makefile.inc call over to
> distrib/notes, which isn't as elegant but was easier to get working
> one port at a time (I'm doing eight of them) because I was already
> cutting and pasting various things in those files.
> 
> Those patches have not been submitted for the release branch though, as
> they are part of an intricate web of ``make release'' overhaul that I
> did in etc/.

IMHO "make release" should also care for putting the INSTALL.* etc. into
the right files, for every port. If anything, etc.*/Makefile.inc should be
able to disable this (for experimental ports that don't have docs set up
etc.).

Also, I wonder why I did not get a secr.tgz, though I have crypto-intl
installed. Is this related? Do I have to set some variable for that to get
generated?


 - Hubert

-- 
NetBSD - Better for your uptime than Viagra