On Thu, 6 Feb 2003, James Chacon wrote:

> Well it mainly means that either TINY should be split out from including
> anything in the normal builds or the "standard" list really is pruned down
> to just the essentials.
>
> TINY is kind of a 1 off for x86.

	Though the same constraints apply to other ports, where less
	memory is a more common occurence.

-- 
		David/absolute          -- www.netbsd.org: No hype required --