On Sun, 12 Sep 2004, Luke Mewburn wrote:
>   | Without -U (but as root) everything's fine.
>   | Sounds like some more safety tests should be added...
>
> No, "build.sh -U distribution" is performing as intended, even when
> run as root; it's not a bug.
>
> Use "build.sh -U sets" and extract the sets.  ("build.sh -U install=/somedir"
> won't install the contents of etc.tgz or xetc.tgz.)
>
> (If you build with -U, you need to run sets,install,... with -U)

Um, wouldn't it be more consistent to have "build.sh distribution" extract
sets like "install=..." does, plus also extract etc.tgz?

To me, the current situation seems a bit confusing...


 - Hubert

-- 
                         ,,_
If wishes were wings,  o"   )~  would fly.            -- Go www.NetBSD.org!
                        ''''