Subject: Re: modload vs. ld/libbfd
To: Ignatios Souvatzis <is@NetBSD.org>
From: Jim Wise <jwise@draga.com>
List: tech-install
Date: 04/02/2005 11:36:53
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Ignatios Souvatzis wrote:

>On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 10:52:32PM +0100, Ignatios Souvatzis wrote:
>> 
>> I think we should either move /usr/bin/ld and /usr/lib/libbfd.so.6 (as of 2.0)
>> 
>My proposed patch is really below.
>	-is
>
>
>--- base/gcc.shl.orig	2004-08-13 01:02:24.000000000 +0000
>+++ base/gcc.shl	2005-03-30 14:55:29.000000000 +0000
>@@ -1,4 +1,6 @@
> # $NetBSD: gcc.shl,v 1.4 2004/08/13 01:02:24 lukem Exp $
>+./usr/lib/libbfd.so.7                              comp-c-shlib            bfd
>+./usr/lib/libbfd.so.7.0                            comp-c-shlib            bfd
                                                     ^^^^^^^^^^^^
Probably obvious, but these should become base-sys-shlib if you take 
this path.

- -- 
				Jim Wise
				jwise@draga.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFCTsoppRpI6SYACmIRAou8AJ9CN62Q1bD/e944q/YdxP8vKsCrWACg1Ky1
FY+4flY8WkM3qkUVwfOvjuY=
=FBpD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----