On Fri, 10 Feb 2006, Jason Thorpe wrote:
> Any reason why we still bother with the kernel+ramdisk?  Maybe it would be 
> better to have kernel + cd9660 + compressed-vnd-image instead?

The ramdisk approach works(!),
and the CD can be removed after loading (which I find nice).

There's no need for a compressed vnd image, for ~50-100MB of 
already-copmressed data.

Plan B would be to put a kernel and extracted sets on the CD and boot from 
int like from a harddisk. That would (probably) work.


  - Hubert