Subject: Re: kernel vs boot-program
To: Tobias Weingartner <weingart@austin.BrandonU.CA>
From: None <rhealey@aggregate.com>
List: tech-kern
Date: 03/15/1994 10:59:47
> Any way to make this a *little* more extensible. As a systems administrator,
> I am sure I could find a use for other '@' tokens. As an aside, how about
> system wide evironment variables. They could start with '@' instead of '$'.
> Then for each process, the environment space would be initialized from the
> '@' space first, then merged with the parents, and what was passed to it.
>
> This could be something like the VMS (did I say VMS?) logicals.
>
> This would make certain things a little easier. For example, the name of
> a machine would just become @hostname. The name expansion could then be
> performed on only '@' tokens, which only root can define, hopefully "solving"
> the security problem.
>
> The most likely candidates for '@'ing would be things like:
> FULLNAME
> HOME
> LOGNAME
> SHELL
> TERM
> TERMCAP
> USER
> HOST
> ARCH
> HOSTTYPE
> HOSTNAME
>
> I'm not quite awake here yet, just sort of thinking out loud. Let me know
> what you think...
>
I think you've forgotten what /etc/profile and /etc/.login are
used for...
We don't have to braindamage the kernel to get functionality we
already have through normal UNIX model means...
-Rob
------------------------------------------------------------------------------