Subject: Re: should splaudio be splbio?
To: None <jtk@kolvir.arlington.ma.us>
From: Mike Long <mike.long@analog.com>
List: tech-kern
Date: 02/12/1996 13:02:30
>Date: Sat, 10 Feb 1996 22:53:41 -0500
>From: John Kohl <jtk@kolvir.arlington.ma.us>
>
>from sys/dev/audio_if.h:
> #define splaudio splbio /* XXX */
> #define IPL_AUDIO IPL_BIO /* XXX */
>
>It strikes me that if you're playing samples from disk, you'd rather not
>have audio stuff block out disk transfers and vice versa.
>
>Is there a better choice we can make for the SPL level for audio stuff?
I doubt it. AFAIK, IPL_BIO is the lowest of the available priority
levels (imp, tty, net, bio). I would much prefer that my soundcard
drop a few samples than to have silo overflows or dropped network
packets.
--
Mike Long <mike.long@analog.com> http://www.shore.net/~mikel
VLSI Design Engineer finger mikel@shore.net for PGP public key
Analog Devices, CPD Division CCBF225E7D3F7ECB2C8F7ABB15D9BE7B
Norwood, MA 02062 USA (eq (opinion 'ADI) (opinion 'mike)) -> nil