Subject: Re: general {82,164,165}50 UART driver
To: Onno van der Linden <onno@simplex.nl>
From: Matt Thomas <matt@lkg.dec.com>
List: tech-kern
Date: 05/29/1996 19:01:06
> (2a) change my driver (the one on ftp.fwi.uva.nl) to use the
> softclock interrupt routine for comsoft() instead of
> the tty software interrupt.
>
> or
>
> (2b) if possible, add a bit of code to alpha/machdep.c for tty software
> interrupts in do_sir() and call comsoft() from there.
> It looks like the hp300 needs this too.
>
> Question:
> Should I go for (2a) or (2b) ?
> or
> Which is "better" 'software interrupts' or 'periodic checks via softclock()' ?
Software interrupts. Since network "isr"s exist, there is no reason why
tty (or disk/tape or ...) isrs should not also exist.
--
Matt Thomas Internet: matt@3am-software.com
3am Software Foundry WWW URL: http://www.3am-software.com/bio/matt.html
Westford, MA Disclaimer: I disavow all knowledge of this message