"Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com> writes:

> I'd say do lptp0, not lpt0p.
> 
> Additionally, I think the chosen letters may be suboptimal...

What would you suggest for LF+CR mode and no-prime?

lptn0  -- lpt no reset 0?

lptl0  -- lpt auto lf 0?

lptnl0 -- both?

> Also, there is the fact that this is inconsistant with mt style device
> numbering...

Yes, but wouldn't it be odd sticking them at the front?

--Michael