Subject: Re: poll(2)
To: Jonathan Stone <jonathan@DSG.Stanford.EDU>
From: John Birrell <jb@cimlogic.com.au>
List: tech-kern
Date: 12/10/1996 12:36:43
Jonathan Stone wrote:
> Re naming, npoll() is more consistent with the sleep()/usleep() usage.
> Does POSIX have anything to say here?
nanopoll() is more consistent with the sleep()/nanosleep() usage which
are defined in POSIX 1003.1b. usleep() is not POSIX AFAIK.
--
John Birrell CIMlogic Pty Ltd
jb@cimlogic.com.au; jb@netbsd.org 119 Cecil Street
Ph +61 3 9690 6900 South Melbourne Vic 3205
Fax +61 3 9690 6650 Australia
Mob +61 18 353 137