Subject: should sysarch take a void? To: None <tech-kern@NetBSD.ORG> From: Perry E. Metzger <perry@piermont.com> List: tech-kern Date: 02/25/1998 13:32:39
The sysarch call is defined as:
int
sysarch(int number, char *args);
where the char * is a pointer to some structure. Should this not be
defined as a void * instead?
If no one objects, I'd like to make that change.
Perry