Subject: should sysarch take a void?
To: None <tech-kern@NetBSD.ORG>
From: Perry E. Metzger <perry@piermont.com>
List: tech-kern
Date: 02/25/1998 13:32:39
The sysarch call is defined as:

     int
     sysarch(int number, char *args);

where the char * is a pointer to some structure. Should this not be
defined as a void * instead?

If no one objects, I'd like to make that change.

Perry