Subject: Re: ddb & shared libs: second results
To: None <jiho@postal.c-zone.net>
From: Ty Sarna <tsarna@endicor.com>
List: tech-kern
Date: 03/30/1998 10:15:30
In article <XFMail.980329044125.jiho@mail.c-zone.net> you write:
> I do hope UVM is more efficient that this sucker. I must say, though, I have
[I know you were talk memory efficiency,
but I just had to rave for a second]
At least speedwise, between the new (old) vfork(), UVM, and PMAP_NEW,
-current feels a _LOT_ faster doing things like "make build". Program
start-up time seems to have been drastically cut.
_Fantastic_ work, guys!