Subject: Re: new TIODCDTIMESTAMP patch
To: Jason Thorpe <thorpej@nas.nasa.gov>
From: Jonathan Stone <jonathan@DSG.Stanford.EDU>
List: tech-kern
Date: 04/20/1998 17:10:18
On Mon, 20 Apr 1998 16:56:41 -0700 (PDT)
Jonathan Stone <jonathan@DSG.Stanford.EDU> wrote:
>> Yes, so it does. But that's the API that xntpd expects.
>It's still a bug.
No, it's a feature. If you want to do a cleaner API, go ahead.
>At the very least, you can initialize the timestamp to zero so that
>there's less of a chance that it will be random garbage.
In com_attach_subr()? The rest of the softc doesn't seem to be zeroed out.