Subject: Re: new TIODCDTIMESTAMP patch
To: None <jonathan@DSG.Stanford.EDU>
From: Paul Repacholi ( prep ) <erepacholi@alpha2.curtin.edu.au>
List: tech-kern
Date: 04/21/1998 21:24:41 
> Then go ahead, everyone here would be glad, but AFAICT we *still* need
> this kludgy interface for xntpd.  

Ah, may I say we don't. If the initial value is valid and correct,
xntpd junking it will not, or should not worry xntpd. Having
an interface with magik context is IMO near broken. Even if it
IS documented.