>On Jul 2, Jason Thorpe wrote
>> I think what we need here is to fix the return value from the specific
>> handler ... i.e. return EJUSTRETURN if additional sense information should
>> NOT be printed (i.e. "it should just return").  Otherwise, the generic
>> handler does print the sense info.
>> 
>
>I think we now all agree on this.

Well, mostly. In fact, I don't see a need to change scsi_base.c
at all now. Unless we go to a different framework entirely.