Subject: Re: Before I offically call this a time bug can someone else try this? (fwd)
To: ITOH Yasufumi <yasufu-i@is.aist-nara.ac.jp>
From: Perry E. Metzger <perry@piermont.com>
List: tech-kern
Date: 08/07/1998 09:41:25
ITOH Yasufumi writes:
> Thus, I think there are no reason that the time_t shall not be
> an unsigned integer *from the standard*.
XPG makes it very clear that time_t is signed. As with off_t's, it
only says that it is an arithmetic type, but then goes on to say that
other types are unsigned, making it clear that "arithmetic type" means
normal signed integer.
Perry