Andrew Brown <atatat@atatdot.net> writes:
> >...
> >A third alternative is to just ignore the problem:  if someone truly wants
> >sub-second time accuracy from the moment their system is booted, perhaps
> >they should be thinking dedicated hardware, not hoping there's enough layers
> >of software bandages over their 300ppm PC clock circuit...
> 
> wouldn't a fourth alternative be to use ntpdate at the earliest
> possible instant( ie, network up, routes installed, binary available)
> to whack the clock into much better shape?

We already do that. That's not the point.

.pm