On Thu, 11 Mar 1999, Ignatios Souvatzis wrote:

On Thu, Mar 11, 1999 at 11:03:49AM -0700, Michael K. Sanders wrote:
[...]
> To prevent the proliferation of inconsistently named commands to
> create filesystems, does anyone think making newfs(8) a wrapper (like
> mount(8)) that calls newfs_ffs/newfs_msdos/newfs_lfs/etc. would be a
> good idea?

It counds good to me; my only concern would be that the fact that
newfs_ffs is currently called `newfs' didn't cause any problems; since
there are a lot more of them than options to mount(8).  Does the new
newfs just pass on all its options besides fs-type to newfs_xxx, or do the
options to newfs_ffs no longer directly work with newfs? 

						Konrad Schroder
						perseant@hhhh.org