On Mar 23, Perry E. Metzger wrote
> 3) Eliminate endianness of FFSes -- this is more controversial. Right
> now, we have bi-endian support, but it would be cool not to need it.

I'm not sure this one is a that good idea. It may have performances
issues. Did someone actually check this on a slow (m68k, vax, ...) machine ?
And which byte order will we use ?

--
Manuel Bouyer, LIP6, Universite Paris VI.           Manuel.Bouyer@lip6.fr
--