Subject: Re: procfs & mount changes (was: ps /proc changes)
To: Greg A. Woods <woods@most.weird.com>
From: Andrew Brown <atatat@atatdot.net>
List: tech-kern
Date: 03/29/1999 16:32:40
>> It is way too easy to mount things on top of /proc and thus
>> fool or confuse programs. I think checking the FS of open /proc
>> files is an important concept that should be put in the man
>> pages for mount_procfs and mount_kernfs. Is there any kind of
>> SECURITY section? I didn't see any in the mdoc.samples man page.
>
>That's why I suggest that procfs be changed so that the directories in
>/proc appear as owned by root, and *not* by the user. It probably
>should have been that way all along, but no doubt when procfs was first
>envisioned it was expected that mount(2) would always require superuser
>priviledges.
how about yet another mount flag that signifies that no other mounts
may be made on top of the named file system? so after all mounts have
been done on a machine, a simple
mount -a -u -o nomount
would render all filesystems un-overlayable. so to speak.
(just random thought noise...)
--
|-----< "CODE WARRIOR" >-----|
codewarrior@daemon.org * "ah! i see you have the internet
twofsonet@graffiti.com (Andrew Brown) that goes *ping*!"
andrew@crossbar.com * "information is power -- share the wealth."