Subject: Re: Changing the semantics of splsoftclock()
To: None <mjacob@feral.com>
From: Justin T. Gibbs <gibbs@caspian.plutotech.com>
List: tech-kern
Date: 06/25/1999 11:31:20 
[ I've dropped tech@openbsd.org based on a request from Theo since
  he cannot post back to some of these lists. ]

>Why have splr semantics? That is, it raises to splsoftclock if current
>priority is lower, else doesn't fiddle with it.

This is what I meant to suggest, but if this is not doable, create a new
spl.

--
Justin