Subject: Re: hto{le,be}{16,32,64}() - a plan
To: Simon Burge <simonb@netbsd.org>
From: Jonathan Stone <jonathan@DSG.Stanford.EDU>
List: tech-kern
Date: 08/07/1999 08:46:25 
Maybe this is a good time to add {hton,ntoh}{16,32,64}() aliases, too?
That might help make it clearer where  LP64 bugs hide.

Tho there are some good reasons to keep using the existing APIs:
they are standards, even tho the `standards' are, from some perspectives,
hopelessly broken...