Eduardo E. Horvath wrote:
> I'd prefer to see cpu_Debugger() nuked from orbit and go back to just
> having Debugger() around.  It makes inserting temporary calls to
> Debugger() a royal pain due to header dependencies and resulting link
> errors.

You can always use cpu_Debugger() ;-)
I don't see mcuh of problem in pulling in one more header - you
would have to add prototype in your test code anyway, otherwise
the code won't compile with -Wstrict-prototypes.

Jaromir
-- 
Jaromir Dolecek <jdolecek@NetBSD.org>      http://www.ics.muni.cz/~dolecek/
"The only way how to get rid temptation is to yield to it." -- Oscar Wilde