In message <199912022130.NAA13756@lestat.nas.nasa.gov>,
Jason Thorpe writes:

>On Thu, 2 Dec 1999 16:24:58 -0500 

[...]
>This isn nothing new; look at SPARC Sun4c systems, which are
>32-virtual/36-physical address space systems.

Or, even earlier, pdp-11s with 18-bit or 20-bit or 22-bit memory
and 16-bit (or 16+16 split I+D) virtual addressing.

Just out of curiosity, can NetBSD on i386 use Xeons this way -- to
make real use of physical memory > max per-process virtual memory?
Or do we have the same limit as that other free-unix system?