> Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com> writes:
> > This is not necessarily a given. Nothing is cast in concrete that MSS3a
> > *has* to be wired to the 1.4.X stream. We do tend to say this internally
> > in the storage-devel group, if only to limit the usual wankage of:
> > 
> > 	1. problem?
> > 	2. update to -current first!
> > 	3. (two weeks of merging). Goto #1.
> 
> yay, people displaying sense and not relying on -current for
> intended-to-be-production systems.

There is nothing about the MSS3 stuff that's intended to be production.